Printed fromChabadGreenwich.org
ב"ה

Blog - Torah Insights

ֿSadducees, Rabbis, and the Smoke of Yom Kippur - אחרי קדושים

 

ֿSadducees, Rabbis, and the Smoke of Yom Kippur

 

More than two thousand years ago, in the Second Temple era, the most severe split within the land of Israel was the dispute between the Sadducees, who read the Bible literally, and the Rabbis, who passed on oral traditions, and interpreted the Biblical text. 

 

One significant point of dispute related to the most important service of the most important day of the year: when the high priest would enter the holy of holies to offer the incense. The Sadducees read the verse to mean that he would put the incense on the coals, outside the holy of holies, and then enter the holy of holies while the coals were already creating smoke. The Rabbis, by contrast, understood the verse to mean that while in the holy of holies, the high priest would place the incense on the coals. 

Since the verse states that “no man should be in the tent of meeting when he {the high priest} enters to atone”, there was no way to know whether the high priest would perform according to the rabbinic tradition or whether he was a closet Sadducee. The Mishnah describes how the Rabbis would administer an oath to the high priest, adjuring him to perform the service as they instructed: 

 

The Elders of the court passed him {the high priest} to the Elders of the priesthood, and they took him up to the House of Avtinas. And they administered him an oath and took leave of him and went on their way. 

 

When they administered this oath, they said to him: My Master, High Priest. We are agents of the court, and you are our agent and the agent of the court. We administer an oath to you in the name of Him who housed His name in this House, that you will not change even one matter from all that we have said to you with regard to the burning of the incense or any other service that you will perform when alone. 

 

After this oath, he would leave them and cry, and they would leave him and cry in sorrow that the oath was necessary. (Yoma 1:5)

 

This dispute was not a mere technicality of how to read a specific verse; but rather, it captured the deep philosophical divide between two notions of what it means to have a relationship with the Divine. In the eyes of the Sadducees, the human being is passive. His role is to accept the Divine wisdom as received from above in the written Torah. The human being is the recipient, whose greatest achievement is the submission to the Divine will. As such, when the high priest enters the holy of holies, expressing the deepest intimacy between human and G-d, he must be passive. 

 

The Rabbis, by contrast, have a completely different view of what it means to be in a relationship with G-d. The human being is in partnership with G-d, who, in the oral Torah, is called upon to interpret and apply the Divine wisdom. In the beginning of our Parsha, referring to the cloud of smoke produced by the incense, G-d states: “for I appear over the ark cover in a cloud”. Rabbis understood that for G-d to appear in the holy of holies, for the intimacy and connection to be established, human effort and input are required. The ultimate connection to G-d is achieved not through submission alone, but through partnership. 

 

For in order for the Divine presence to appear in the holy of holies, the high priest must actively create the cloud of smoke.  

 

 

Can you Balance Both Perspectives? - תזריע מצורע

 

Can you Balance Both Perspectives? 


A healthy relationship depends on a difficult skill: holding your own feelings while genuinely making space for someone else’s.


The Kabbalah describes this phenomenon in our relationship with G-d as “higher knowledge”, the Divine perspective, and “lower knowledge”, the human perspective. 


One of the many ramifications of this idea is how we view challenge and pain. From the human perspective, challenge equals disappointment, frustration, and pain. From the Divine perspective, challenge is an invitation to uncover deeper treasures and blessings. 


In this week’s portion, we read about Tzaraat, a biblical form of discoloration, which, when appearing on a home, rendered the home ritually impure. In some cases, some of the stones of the home required removal, while in other cases, the entire home would have to be demolished. 


Rashi explains that the verse describing the Tzaraat of the home uses a joyous tone, as if the appearance was a positive phenomenon. That is because, when the stones were removed, they would discover treasures that were hidden within the walls: 


This is [good] news for them that lesions of tzara’ath will come upon them, because the Amorites had hidden away treasures of gold inside the walls of their houses during the entire forty years that the Israelites were in the desert, and through the lesion, he will demolish the house and find them. 


When a person experiences a challenge or difficulty, he experiences only pain and frustration. From the human perspective, even if something positive will eventually emerge from the challenge, it will come at a future time and is not sensed in the present. From G-d’s perspective, every challenge is an invitation to remove the bricks and discover a treasure. 


A healthy relationship respects both perspectives. We don’t abandon our pain, but we believe that from the Divine perspective, every affliction is just a facade, begging to be pulled away, in order to allow the discovery of a great treasure of opportunity and growth.


Can you be too holy? - שמיני

 

Can you be too holy? 


Can you be too holy? 


Can you be too close to the person you love? 


According to the sages, that precisely was the sin of the sons of Aaron, who, on the day of the inauguration of the temple, “brought before the Lord foreign fire, which He had not commanded them.” This was so severe that “fire went forth from before the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.”


Further in the book of Leviticus, the Torah describes their story as: “they drew near before the Lord, and they died.” Apparently, one can be too close. Drawing too near can be a problem. 


The book of formation, the earliest Kabbalistic written work, states, “if your heart runs, return to one”. The later mystics explain that one must “run and return”. An intense desire to transcend and become close to G-d must be followed with a “return”, a commitment to fulfill the will of G-d, within the limited confines of time and space. The soul may push to “run”, with passion and ecstasy, toward her beloved G-d, but she must ask herself: what does my beloved want? The soul may want to be in heaven, but G-d wants her to be right here on earth, in this specific place at this specific time.   


The idea of "running and returning”, can be applied to so many areas of life. 


When we find something or someone we love, we are full of enthusiasm; a new idea, a new relationship, a new opportunity. We feel the pulsing energy of the “running”, nothing can stop us. But whether the passion will create something sustainable in our life depends not on the intensity of the excitement but rather on whether we can “return”, implement it in our daily lives, through specific, ongoing, seemingly mundane actions. 


The day after the Exodus from Egypt, the Jewish people understood that a single event, even an event as profound as the Exodus, would not have a lasting impact unless it affected their daily routine. They therefore began counting forty-nine days as preparation for Sinai, representing their effort to apply themselves to internal refinement and personal growth. 


Passover is the holiday that allows us to experience the energy of freedom from internal negativity that holds us back. Now is the time to “return”, to ask ourselves what specific actions we are going to take to allow us to live a life of liberation, focused on our values and priorities. 



Looking for older posts? See the sidebar for the Archive.